vapeloki
@vapeloki@lemmy.world
- Comment on AI haters be like: 1 day ago:
Maybe this helps for people stumbling over this thread: A Google Coral device can do classification on images with around 18fps. That is a 2w USB device.
That is the power of a well built DNN.
And you can adapt this this stuff like Monitoring data, network traffic and much more. All “AI”, same basic technology like ChatGPT and Claude but made for specific tasks. And they do their tasks damn fucking well
- Comment on Growth and cuck mindset 1 day ago:
We are polyamorous. To bad that we don’t own a restaurant :(
- Comment on AI haters be like: 1 day ago:
Platform and systems Architect for a german managed Services provider here.
I second that. Currently, I am working on replacing external AI providers with 150W AMD hardware. Most of our teams used LLMs for stuff where classical ML is far more reliable and faster.
The few places where LLMs are needed, we still can do locally.
So, instead of spending millions in some tokens that take gigawatt of Power, we estimate that our 5k employees will need a total power of 5kw across Europe. We have 100x the solar distributed across our locations.
We conflate LLM or Diffusion with AI here, because most had never contact with other kinds of AI.
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 4 days ago:
I don’t care because I have no relation to this guy, and honestly, fighting the AfD and our current government is more important for me then some idiot in the USA, that should never have bin put on a ballot in the first place.
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 4 days ago:
Gut, wenn du Exit kennst. Dann weiß tdu auch das es genügend menachen gibt die fa Landen weil sie es nicht verstehen was es bedeutet. Ernsthaft, ließ seine Kommentare. Der Typ ist einfach zu blöd es zu verstehen. Der gehört nicht in die Politik. Punkt
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 4 days ago:
And, again you did not read his commwnts, you did not have a look at the deleted comments database
You asshole just echo some sentiment without checking the facts for yourself.
You did not read my other comments …
This moron called white America racist, around the same time he defended the SS dudes.
He called himself a communist and more.
I did not found anything about him throwing granades, and I DON’T CARE. USA, the land where kids can walk with full automatic weapons in a school and shoot other kids, and all You do is fucking thoughts and prayers.
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 4 days ago:
Do you no exit e. V.? A German organization that helps neo nazis to exit the scene? No? Maybe check this.
Bo defending a nazi is not the same as being a Nazi.
Read the fucking comments.
And I said: I don’t know.
I never said you can’t say what you want.
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 5 days ago:
I do not need nothing.
Why should I care? I want to understand, that’s all. Maybe just read my other comments…
And, maybe you should read the fucking comments of him defending the SS dudes. He is not a nazi. He is just as stupid as one.
On the rape, no idea. Of course, believe women and investigate, but still, assumption of innocence holds.
But after all, America vote a class of Nazis and Neop Babies into power. A convicted rapist, fraud and openly corrupt man.
But hey, this dude is your biggest problem ATM?
Yeah. Nobody can help America anymore. You are lost
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 5 days ago:
To me I came across like, “If you discredit a politician you’re no better than a Nazi,” even though in some situations, like this one, there are legitimate reasons to consider a politician discredited.
Sorry, that was not my intention. Let me rephrase this: We are living in a political environment, where old Nazi tactics are applied, based on my observations mostly from the political right. I see many echoed statements from people, that never even had a look at the images, his comments and more.
This is bad. We should assume that everything anybody says about a politician is a lie until proven otherwise. Thats the assumption of innocence and always true, but especially now.
Also, again, not claiming YOU do this.
The proof was already there. I guess you needed to see it on the specific location the see the similarities? Generally, asking for proof when there’s already proof is going to get a negative reaction.
As i stated multiple times, i could not say if it is the same or not. I am autistic, so, it maybe a personal thing, but for me it was not clear at all. Proof is not “i can see it, trust me!”, but, "Here it is, everybody now has the same facts and information, independently from his personal feelings, past experiences and interpretation.
And my conclusion currently: This dude did some very uninformed, very stupid stuff. I can not see that he is or was a rightwinger or Nazi, even in comments used against him (defining idiots that have “bolt” tattoos) he makes it political position clear.
Do i think somebody that defends people with literal SS tattoos is somebody that should have political power? No, but not because he is a Nazi, no, just because he is stupid AF.
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 5 days ago:
First, i never said YOU did not think! How do you assume i have this opinion of you? I said as much as you may be right!
Second, i did the work to CONFORM your statement, something i asked for repeatedly from people that state “trust me bro, this is true”.
Here we go, 5 minute gimp job. But asking for proof is considered hostile now? WTF???
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 5 days ago:
If you have an image that shows that much detail, please provide it. I really want to see it. I have not seen any. I see some. Black outlines that’s all.
And from what I can see, the eyes would be different than on the SS version, and details in the bones are also not visible.
Still, it could be like you said the exact version. I can not tell.
And of course does the UK skull not look like this. But: skull on bone is a common symbol. Look for the example at this pre-nazi Symbol.
If we don’t question the given facts, and form our own opinion, we are not better then the real Nazis.
Discrediting political opponents was fire part of their playbook.
(I am a German anitfaschist, breaking Nazi bones since 2000, and I am not here to defend anyone, just to animate independent thinking)
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 5 days ago:
Read my other comments. I link this because this is the only real source, and for reference. A German! Wikipedia article.
No, nobody was an idiot for not seeing this, most Germans would not know that this was a Nazi symbol. And wearing those symbols is illegal here.
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 5 days ago:
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 5 days ago:
Ok, after some closer look, it could resemble the SS “Mützenabzeichen”, but it could also just be a generic skull.
BTW, the British atme are no nazis are they? www.army.mod.uk/…/royal-lancers/
I can not say what exactly that tattoo was there is no clear image I found, so I can not jump to conclusions in any direction.
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 5 days ago:
Thanks a lot!
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 5 days ago:
You don’t have the original post, image or link, that discussion was placed under do you? Srsly, I can’t form an informed opinion with only selected facts.
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 5 days ago:
German here. Is there any real image of the tattoo anywhere? I could only find some images with a big black blob.
- Comment on Context is for people that read US news 5 days ago:
Source?
- Comment on One of the good uses for AI. Klingon Bluegrass. 6 days ago:
This is the worsed use of ai.
Are wer closer cure an illnesses or solve world hunger?
No, this video only added to the climate change
- Comment on 1 week ago:
Heat pumps are just ACs that heat. We can switch ours between heating in cooling
- Comment on 2 weeks ago:
Me, having air air heat pumps for heating. Lucky coincidence they are not only very efficient in heating, they saved my life with 40°C out there
- Comment on Taking a spin around the pond in my boat 2 weeks ago:
When you build your port in civi just to get the boost
- Comment on Microsoft's open source tools were hacked to steal passwords of AI developers 4 weeks ago:
Archive Link: archive.ph/uUqkO
- Comment on 3 months ago:
So. Hosting shared files is the same as hosting a game you sell. And want the people to buy it and not just download, some kind of at least activation? Right?
- Comment on 3 months ago:
Because p2p … How exactly does this apply to content distribution? Torrents are not always a reliable option…
- Comment on 3 months ago:
GOG takes 30%, most publishers take 30 to 50%, apple app store takes 30%, as does Google.
Is this to high? Maybe, I don’t publish games. But at least it is not absurd in means of industry standards :(
- Comment on 3 months ago:
Never said that. But what is better for the dev? Using those services or run their own?
And I am fine with Valve making absurd profits, after all, they have put at least 500.000.000 USD into open source (Around 100-200 external oss devs on payroll for projects like Mesa, SDL,…).
Will I leave steam and call valve out if they get toxic? Yes! Are they evil or the enemy right now? To the contrary.
- Comment on 3 months ago:
My day job is designing complex IT platforms.
And the cost goes massive down with size.
So. If your game sells badly, you will most likely spend more. Oney in hosting and distribution then you would make profit.
For example, assume your game has around 50gb. You sell 100 copies of it. You can easily calculate 1-2$ per download.
Add your own personal on top of it, someone has to run that stuff, and licensing and more for statistics tooling and more.
Platforms like valve allow indie devs and small studios to avoid all those costs upfront.
“Not that much” depends on the view
- Comment on 3 months ago:
What exactly is this the answer to?
Yes, they make a shit load of money. But assuming you want to distribute a game directly, how much of would that cost you, and let’s ignore the whole visibility shit for a second.
- Comment on 3 months ago:
Hearing those arguments for how many years now? Right …
The day Gabe is bo longer there things may get ugly, may.
But, Valve is not publicly traded, or has to cater to shareholders in any way. That is the reason they are still who they are.