Anyone know where these numbers came from?
Somethings wrong about a system where nearly half of its workers need two jobs to survive.
Submitted 1 day ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to workreform@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/b3864dcc-98a8-4d6b-8951-b95076d714d8.jpeg
Comments
Steve@communick.news 1 day ago
DagwoodIII@piefed.social 23 hours ago
Basic reality.
It’s not a difficult search. Look up rents, and then food prices, and then average salaries.
Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 20 hours ago
If I wasn’t married, I’d have to have roommates to survive, I couldn’t afford the average 1 bedroom apartment in my area and I make over 100k
partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 19 hours ago
Same here. It’s depressing, too… I was really hoping to make good money, but a good home with a nice yard, have pets and the whole thing…
I also make over 100k and I can’t afford shit. It seems like every raise is met with an increase in cost of living. I’m just lucky to have kept my head above rising water.
flandish@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
the first person to put working class into “middle/lower/upper” was a marketing genius. wish i knew who. for there is no real “middle class” - it’s all just working class, but separated means infighting and infighting means not fighting the owning class.
DagwoodIII@piefed.social 23 hours ago
When Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, ‘middle class’ in the US was still defined as one job supporting a family of four. In those days, $1 million was considered a vast fortune.
By the time Bush the elder left office, ‘middle class’ was two jobs to support the family, and $1 million was what a rich guy paid for a party.