It's actually that simple.

Comments

• HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Okay, I’m gonna bite this bait - isn’t consent something decided later? Nobody can prove they said “yes or no” later after all so usually it’s based on who we decide to trust.

  source

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    So you’re saying that when you have sex with someone, you don’t know if you’re raping them, but you will find out later and that’s normal?

    Have you ever had sex? And if so, for how many have you been convicted?

    source

    • HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I am saying, that a person can consent now, and then claim no consent and sue you later. Which I hope never happens to you, but the idea is quite an useful loophole.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • bhamlin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Consent can absolutely be decided immediately. But as the situation changes, consent can too. You might’ve been ok with safe sex, and said only “yes” assuming that was the situation. Only to then find out there never was a condom and now you have a greatly increased risk of pregnancy or disease. That consent is now revoked, and retroactively. That isn’t a case of “lol too bad you said yes.”

    source

    • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      What about after everyone agrees, the person looks back, and regrets it for some reason.

      Can they prosecute for rape, even if you followed all the rules of consent?

      Also, one of the reasons I was thinking to just have the other person just tie me to a bed or something and use me, they can do what they want and unless they do something pretty stupid, revoke my own consent. And they literaly can’t be raped if they have to do everything themselves.

      No wondering if this person changed their mind or are faking it or something, because they can always just get off, ensuring consent is now just the other person’s problem.

      source
    • HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      No, I’m asking about changing consent retroactively.

      Say I consent today, we have fun… and in a few days I get informed that I could earn some money by claiming I did not consent.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • Leomas@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    No, if a person doesn’t want to do something and the other person does something anyway, that breaks consent that second.

    source

    • HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Yes, but what if a person decides that while they may have consented originally during the act, they benefit more from saying they have not consented later on?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• daannii@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Gonna disagree with the dead one. Being dead isn’t consent.

  Did no one else notice that snuck in?

  source

  • Chais@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    That’s the “joke.”

    source

    • daannii@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Forgot which community this was posted in.

      source
• ViscloReader@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Must’ve been the wind

  source
• snowydroopz@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  @yellowwera@lemmy.world

  source