I’m surprised no one addressed this yet, but 70s cars are in limited supply, and that’s before you account for groups who would buy one given the option. Then what happens when there’s no more 70s car? Can’t exactly just get another one
If I got in a collision with a car from the 70s with a car today, would not the 70s car win out since it would primarily be metal? If so why don't people buy more 70's cars?
Submitted 3 months ago by Patnou@lemmy.world to [deleted]
Comments
Battle_Masker@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 months ago
IWW4@lemmy.zip 3 months ago
If the car was a 1970s Ford Pinto it is likely that it would be consumed in a roaring fire.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
More Teslas have burned up than all the Pintos.
IWW4@lemmy.zip 3 months ago
I didn’t know that, but that doesn’t surprise me.
s08nlql9@sopuli.xyz 3 months ago
friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 3 months ago
48 minutes? I totally have tile for that while scrolling.
MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
I was in a fender bender a few years ago where the other party insisted on getting the police involved because of injury - the passenger slumped dramatically to the ground complaining of whiplash. The officer who attended said, “You don’t have whiplash.” And explained to her the concept of crumple zones in modern cars absorbing forces from impact. Then he declared it a no-fault accident (it was actually my fault).
HubertManne@piefed.social 3 months ago
My sister would gush about her H3. Oh it made her feel so safe with her kids. Yeah safe for her and her kids.
K1nsey6@lemmy.world 3 months ago
In an accident something has to take the brunt of the impact, in newer cars, the crumple zones of the frame take the brunt of the impact. In older cars with more rigid frames, your body takes the brunt of the impact. That’s why people don’t buy older cars