With what's happening to Grok AI, from a socialist perspective (Marxist or not), how do you think AI would be taken care of?

Comments

• communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I don’t think socialist thought has anything to do with this.

  source
• 6nk06@sh.itjust.works ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  What’s happening besides being shit, and what does the left have to do with it?

  source

  • justdaveisfine@piefed.social ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Could be a poison pill prompt meant to lure out bot responses that wouldn’t realize its bogus?

    source
• FiniteBanjo@feddit.online ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Grok is in the USA and if you want regulation and taxing the rich in the USA then the only option is removing Republicans from office, namely voting for the DNC.

  source

  • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Except like being against removing ice and dhs, dems are against Ai regulations

    politico.com/…/ai-job-losses-populism-democrats-b…

    prospect.org/…/democratic-voters-clamoring-for-ai…

    www.thenation.com/…/democrats-ai-regulation/

    source

    • TheFogan@programming.dev ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Well we can fully agree, democrats are republican light. The bottom line is most democrats are opposed to rational policies like, removing ICE, DHS, Regulating AI etc… All politicians who are for any of those things, are democrats, no politicians who are for those things are republicans, and the system does not allow 3rd parties. Point is the only strategy within voting… is.

      Primary all centrist/moderate democrats with someone that actually stands with the majority of people. Support those primary candidates as best as possible, and then vote for whoever the democratic nominee is, as I still would hold that the worse democrat is still currently better than the best republican.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I feel like you’re not reading the articles you sent me.

      The Politico articles starts with an outline of all the efforts by Democrats to regulate AI starting in the Biden administration and becoming stronger over time. Near the end it mentions Ron DeSantis stands against AI, which is an outlier but fair, and also Marjorie Taylor Greene which isn’t really fair because her party hasn’t actually enacted any such regulations while in power.

      Prospect talks about how the DNC are campaignig against AI and winning, then goes on to talk about Hakeem Jeffries’ new committee on AI and how the 5 members get campaign funds from AI companies, but then it goes on to talk about the Republican bill which preemptively blocks state level regulation of AI and how Republicans are fundamentally opposed to restraining corporate power.

      TheNation says pretty much the exact same thing as Prospect but less supportive of the DNC.

      So you have a party that has a history of Regulating AI, who is campaigning on Regulating AI, and running against a party who is extremely Pro-AI, but you don’t believe it?

      source

      • -> View More Comments