Since they already support the current evidence as it sits and may want the world to know the full scope of this?
great britian has a ton of british pedophiles on the epstein files, they arnt releasing it either if they have it.
Submitted 4 hours ago by snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world to [deleted]
Since they already support the current evidence as it sits and may want the world to know the full scope of this?
great britian has a ton of british pedophiles on the epstein files, they arnt releasing it either if they have it.
How has some anon group not manahed to hack / leak them yet?
On one hand, I imagine the administration is treating these documents with the utmost care.
On the other hand, it sounds like thousands of people have been involved in handling them.
There are probably dozens of people with their own copies, ready for use as blackmail.
kept it tight wraps. they most likely know if someone tried to leak it or is negligent.
If you are referring to the UK government, I’m going to guess no. They either don’t have the full version or they won’t be interested in releasing the files themselves. The brother of the current pointy hat wearer is up to his non-sweaty elbows in this mess and they don’t want to have to deal with this and damage the monarchy further.
If you’re referring to a UK publication, they will probably not be able to release the full dossier. They would have to carefully tread around any UK citizen or noble d-head involved because they don’t want to be knee deep in defamation lawsuits.
What we need is a country that no one thinks they’re biased or has an agenda or much to lose under a 250,000 percent US tariff. So not Russia or Venezuela. Or China or Iraq or Afghanistan or Canada or Denmark … Maybe Vanuatu will do. The only problem is that even if the entire dossier was accurate and unedited, you won’t have to wait long until reasonable doubt gets injected into the public debate that it was doctored before release. The effect of the release will not lead to immediate resignations, firings, arrests, etc.
I would guess that leading English speaking newsrooms probably have access to enough of it already and that what’s there is not enough for a spectacular release. And a possible kill order of the pedophile in prison will probably not have left a paper trail. And it will not clearly say Trump or Bubba raped teenagers although the smoke around the fire will be tough to ignore. Circumstantial evidence is not the same as proof.
Yes. Who would stop us?
No one I hope.
I dunno , theres always the in-bred Fuckingham Palace Scum.
There's probably a few or the "red tory" party who sucked - or at least tried their hardest to suck - clinton dick before they switched to licking bush.
CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
The UK already had its own epstein island moment with a child sex traficking scandal involving british parliment, it vanished inside a week.