Submitted 1 year ago by reddig33@lemmy.world to moviesandtv@lemmy.film
https://www.wired.com/story/masterpiece-in-disarray-david-lynchs-dune-an-oral-history-excerpt/
I would love to see the “lost” footage mentioned in this article. Would make a great expanded mini series for some streamer. I know after this flopped that a four hour version ended up in syndicated TV, but this article mentions there’s like seven hours of cut scenes!
This was an amazing article. Loved reading through each interview.
Harlan Ellison: “Frank is holding it back because it’s a dog” Frank: "It’s not a dog, I never held it back. Harlan has a chip on his shoulder. "
Aw. This is the “Dune” I liked. The new one wasn’t nearly cheesey enough and filled with whisper talking and took forever to get anywhere.
I think they were trying to go the Bladerunner route with this reboot. Y'know, feast for the eyes as well.
What, the Lynch Dune wasn’t a feast for the eyes??
As much as I love Lynch’s Dune, I have no need to see the stuff that got cut. I remember the Alan Smithee edit. I understood exactly why those added scenes were left out in the original release. The quality was just lacking
NoiseColor@startrek.website 1 year ago
I’m a big fan of the movie, i never understood why people didn’t like it. It’s a classic. One of the rare scifi that gives you this grandiose feeling of being in a big universe with lots of politics and interests everywhere. The new dune doesn’t give you this feeling. The new one is generic scifi. Not that I don’t like it, but if a story is happening in the year 10.000 than the setting should be strange, esoteric, hard to comprehend. This old movie tried to do this, the new one doesn’t have that.
xyzzy@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I like both, but I agree 100% with your characterization of the original movie. The world of the distant future, and even the cultures within it, should feel utterly bizarrely and occasionally incomprehensible.
jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I just don’t understand why the new one exists at all. Dune was already re-done as a perfectly acceptable mini-series on the sci-fi channel.
caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
That was Children of Dune.
caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
The old movie was a fever dream crossed with an acid trip.
Dunno about the new one being generic sci-fi. I mean, I think you’re wrong but i wouldn’t be able to guess how you formed that opinion so I can’t begin to argue it.
maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 1 year ago
When I watch a Villeneuve sci-fi it all feels very safe and respectable, like the folks involved don’t want to stray too far from the source material and invite any controversy into the production or reception if the film.
It all feels very slick and clever the way advertising and marketing often does.
I enjoyed the film, but in no way did I feel like anyone involved had anything to say or any personality of their own.
The 80s Dune fucking oozes personality and creativity.
NoiseColor@startrek.website 1 year ago
It feels like the year 2200 not the year 10000. I know that’s strange to say. Everything is familiar, it could be another movie. When I watch it, my mind doesnt start to wonder about the back stories of people, buildings,… I don’t have to use my brain, it’s all there.