An unethical, evil bastard society that ought to be extinct.
Unequivocally, death to eugenics.
Submitted 1 year ago by dope@lemm.ee to [deleted]
An unethical, evil bastard society that ought to be extinct.
Unequivocally, death to eugenics.
Most people wouldn’t have the courage to assert such a controversial opinion.
This is disturbingly reminiscent of eugenics.
thank you captain obvious
You know what’s weird? I’ve heard it so many times: getting a PhD is about putting in the work and less about being intelligent.
From my perspective, if we want a smarter society, we need a society willing to do the work of actually being smart and informed. But that kinda has to start with us, who are loathe to read a god damn book, let alone substantively be informed. So, yeah, makes perfect sense that it’d be easier to just be unethical than put in the work.
This suggests that intelligence is either the ability or willingness to focus. Or the ability/willingness to focus on certain “smart materials”.
Yes…yes it does.
At least we wouldn’t have to worry about your genes propagating
Apart from eugenics being fucked up and monstrous, IQ is an antiquated measure of only one very specific kind of intelligence so your premise is inherently flawed.
You people are like some kind of low-hanging-fruit harvester’s convention.
And what premise? There’s no premise there as far as I can tell.
I think you should stop taking BuzzFeed quizzes and go look up what “premise” means.
Full of people that cheat on IQ tests.
Being smart doesn’t make one good at things. IQ tests don’t actually measure smart. It was developed as a test for children, to catch those needing extra help.
Assuming you didn’t standardize the IQ each generation back to 100 like you should…
It wouldn’t exist. The number of people over 130IQ that pro-create (and more specifically how many children they have) simply isn’t high enough. That’s only 2% of the population to start with, and you’d have to find viable pairs between people who often hate each other.
The entire economy would collapse, you’d be lucky to end up with even 100 million people globally at the end of 3 generations without some sort of forced breeding program.
One would think that a passably smart society would handle tweaking the test, population replacement and the economy just fine. They don’t strike me as significant barriers. I mean seriously. Do you have anything better?
Nazi Germany
Full of soulless monsters? What answer were you looking for dude? What answer do you think would justify genocide through mass sterilization?
Such passion. I can tell that your heart is in the right place.
We would lose a lot of art and creativity, customer service at every company would be empty, everyone would believe they’re too smart to work basic service jobs so infrastructure would collapse. Lots of high IQers have pretty low motivation, especially for things outside their specific interests, so I think we would have very fast cars and really good recreational drugs. There are some who believe that the increase in autism comes from similarly minded people procreating, so that could be an issue.
While I agree that stupid people shouldn’t breed, anyone with the idea that they should be forced to become neutered should be counted among them.
But that doesn’t answer the question.
It’s a dumb question and you know it.
Ya it doesn’t work that way.
fubo@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It would be full of people who are okay with that kind of bullshit, because that would be a requirement to pull off that kind of bullshit.
dope@lemm.ee 1 year ago
We are getting a lot of brave replies like that.