Ms Ryan said that she planned to introduce another private member’s bill during the upcoming term of federal parliament, after an initial bill in 2018 failed to pass.
16 makes sense to me. In some states, like SA, it is the minimum age at which you can choose to begin transitioning into the broader adult society. If someone is driving on the same roads as me, working the same hours as me and paying the same tax as me then they should definitely have the right to vote like me too. I don’t think the argument needs to get any more complex or philosophical than this, it’s just obviously a fair and rational change to make.
Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone 3 weeks ago
Let’s push for a voting age cap.
hitmyspot@aussie.zone 3 weeks ago
I disagree. Many older people are more conservative. However, they have a right to their views. We shouldn’t disenfranchise anyone.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 weeks ago
The argument isn’t that they shouldn’t vote because they’re conservative. It’s that they shouldn’t vote because they literally won’t experience the long term consequences of their decisions.
My personal preference is to allow 16 year olds to vote without creating a maximum voting age, but if in some weird world the only way to allow 16 year olds to vote was to ban those over 80 from voting, I would support that in a heartbeat.
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Teenagers are quite literally disenfranchised.
Tenderizer@aussie.zone 2 weeks ago
Make it non-compulsory for over-65’s.
Although that would 100% give license to the LNP to make it non-compulsory for everyone, and our compulsory voting system is what makes us immune to populism (that and our country not crumbling before our very eyes).
nonentity@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Eligible to vote at 16.
Mandatory at 18.
Votes are then weighted based on age:
Your vote is worth 100% until 20, then decreases 5% at every birthday ending in 0.
The older you get, the less you’re exposed to policy decisions made at the time.
There should also be strict term limits for, and mandatory exclusion and retirement from, elected positions. You can still hold advisory roles, but you shouldn’t be making decisions that affect a population when you’re in the upper 20% band of life expectancy.
dellish@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I agree with weighted voting, but not based on age. I really think your vote should come with a questionnaire that covers current issues and policies. If your answers show you have no clue what’s going on, your vote means less.