I’d understand if it wasn’t a game developer, but this looks like a clear case of piggybacking.
Also, fuck gambling.
Submitted 20 hours ago by CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world to games@lemmy.world
I’d understand if it wasn’t a game developer, but this looks like a clear case of piggybacking.
Also, fuck gambling.
Sometimes you just gotta ask yourself if the juice is worth the squeeze.
Meow that’s right
Naughty Dog has been a shitty name for a studio in the first place.
Reminds me of DogFart productions 😅 If you don’t know what that is, don’t look it up.
Sony doing a Nintendo.
“Naughty publisher”
echodot@feddit.uk 19 hours ago
That has to be the most flimsy lawsuit I’ve ever heard. Any lawyer that can win with that case is a freaking genius.
Uruanna@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Surely there must be a Naughty Bunny somewhere that could shoot that right back at them? Maybe not in video game trademarks.
echodot@feddit.uk 12 hours ago
I guarantee that Naughty Bunny makes sex toys.
bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
Naughty Spiderbro
Cause I keep spiderbros