Wish they would’ve done that for Figma’s ridiculous Dev Mode^tm^
Tesla ‘Robotaxi’ trademark refused for being too generic
Submitted 14 hours ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.zip
https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/07/tesla-robotaxi-trademark-refused-for-being-too-generic/
Comments
dr_robotBones@reddthat.com 6 hours ago
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Will the things use LIDAR? Tesla is so far behind on self-driving tech in their cars, I think they need to finally admit their cheap camera-only method doesn’t work.
SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 13 hours ago
Obviously you don’t understand that lidar is a waste of time and camera only if exactly what a car needs.
Musk, probably
nolefan33@sh.itjust.works 13 hours ago
If cars needed lidar, why did God make them without it?
XaetaCore@lemmy.xaetacore.net 9 hours ago
“I probably know more than anyone alive about manufacturing” Literally same year “ThE CyBeR RoAdStEr WiLl Be DeLiVeReD nExT yEaR” said every year it got delayed for the last 10 years
kooks_only@lemmy.ca 13 hours ago
Sorry, couldn’t read this. My eyes were just blinded by Tesla headlights.
CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 5 hours ago
XaetaCore@lemmy.xaetacore.net 9 hours ago
Cybercar Cybercab Robotaxi X Space X
Do i need to go on, its like a 12 year old coming up with names. Good thing that they refuse these trademarks because it gives me vietnam flashbacks from the REACT youtube channel
Ledericas@lemm.ee 9 hours ago
it looks like a repurposed cybertruck.
harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 hours ago
Trademark office about to get DOGEd.
I’m surprised Musk didn’t name it “RoboTaXXXi” or something like that.
resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 13 hours ago
RoboTakkkksi.
someguy3@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Robo69taxi420.
1337robotaxi.
Roboslavewantsyouinsideher.
Mac@mander.xyz 12 hours ago
He’ll come back with XxRoboTaxi42069xX most assuredly.