Not STEM inherently, but I thought this community might have a handful of sympathizers
Imagine seeing Ted Kacynzki in your math proof.
"Me Ug! Ug feel ACADEMIC!"
Submitted 2 days ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/dbf6db77-0077-40cc-81f2-e4ac7652b8d2.jpeg
Comments
CluckN@lemmy.world 2 days ago
mkwt@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Better known for other work.
FiskFisk33@startrek.website 23 hours ago
ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 2 days ago
As an R&D engineer I feel both seen and offended by this meme. Excellent work, am I ok to cite this meme in IEEE format?
azolus@slrpnk.net 2 days ago
Oh no, APA style
UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 days ago
Hey, what’s wrong with APA?
azi@mander.xyz 1 day ago
Author-date systems create line noise that makes text hard to grok. Numeric systems (with or without footnotes) don’t have that problem. Honestly I don’t see the point of author-date. If a a paper is really important then it should be referenced in prose, otherwise “(Kowalchuck et al., 2018)” doesn’t tell you anything more than “[11]”; you’re still gonna need to look it up in the bibliography. And that looking up is actually made harder: finding [11] between [10] and [12] is easier than finding Kowalchuk between Kowal and Kowalski or whatever other names happen to be there.
F04118F@feddit.nl 2 days ago
The “Peter” bit reminded me: Years back, there was a viral trend on Dutch socials where women shared a hashtag “I am Peter” to raise awareness that there were more people named Peter in Boards of Directors than women.