PugJesus
@PugJesus@lemmy.world
Alt of PugJesus for ensuring Fediverse compatibility and shit
- Comment on [deleted] 3 days ago:
I’m sure he’s screaming at us from his tower, feeling smug about how he’s always right.
How utterly bizarre.
Like, the only question of correctness in this entire argument is regarding my supposed transphobia, which you’ve had zero evidence of.
It’s the queers and brown people who are wrong to the cishet white man who doesn’t go outside.
Uh. Sorry for not matching your stereotype.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 days ago:
It’s very impressive how he can be so sure of himself yet not let facts contractict himself.
It’s funny because at no point have you presented anything even vaguely resembling facts, just accusations that you can’t back up.
He’s not a transphobe, the trans people are wrong!
… by all means, quote my supposed transphobia.
Ah, wait, of course - you can’t, because this is all bullshit predicated on the standard notion that lies spread by repetition.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 days ago:
Bruh, who do you think I’m not talking to directly, exactly?
- Comment on [deleted] 3 days ago:
And Pug is still stalking this thread and replying exclusively to you and me so Ada and other Admins can’t see him.
what
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
And still can’t,
Go ahead, sweetheart, find a comment where I refuse to use someone’s preferred pronouns. You should be able to back up what you say with evidence, after all, like I did - at least if this isn’t some bizarrely delusional obsession with me. :)
and still insists Ada is evil for blocking him. Very pathetic behavior.
From “I can’t believe he won’t even correct the record where Ada can see!” to “Wow I sure am glad Ada made sure she can’t see him correct the record!”
Fascists like you do enjoy playing with words, after all. :)
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
Admiral Patrick and PugJeuss are the smae person effectively. Both hate actions being called out.
Sorry for providing evidence of your bullshit, lmao. I know you hate evidence.
By the way, SmugJesus replied to St Elesewere and said Ada is lying about him. He knows you and Ada can’t rebuke him, so he replies only to people who can’t read his messages to prove him wrong.
I have literally spoken directly to Ada several times on the issue, and her response was to block me. Sorry that not everyone is a coward like you. :)
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
Hey Pug, I thought you were leaving this place? Can’t quite let someone you hate get away with being correct?
Sorry for coming back to check on a ping, I know my constant posting is unchanged from my previous usage.
I’m also sorry that you’re assmad over being called out, with evidence, on your utter bullshit. :)
Sorry I call out your actions, are you sure you’re not the teseract dev? You hate when people document your actions and crash out when people do.
It’s particularly amusing since I actually backed up my claim with evidence, while your claim of “stalking” amounts to a handful of downvotes over the course of a single day.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
Pug couldn’t handle this basic request for decency. *shrugs
Again, I never failed to use Drag’s pronouns, nor did I object to the neopronouns used. In fact, Drag never gave me any guff about acknowledging dragons, and likewise, I never bothered Drag about it. It was always unrelated people insisting that I had to acknowledge the reality of dragons existing, or else be transphobic.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
I check when I get a ping notification.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
Unfortunately, Ada still to this day spreads slander that I do not respect neopronouns, despite that explicitly not being the issue and being corrected on that.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
Because I, while on a non-Blahaj instance and having not used any Blahaj comms in months, opined that while I would use anyone’s neopronouns, including Drag’s, and had no interest in getting into an argument with anyone about their gender, I didn’t think dragons were real.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
Downvoting a handful of comments is stalking, while this is just normal non-obsessive behavior, eh?
- Comment on Calling on lemmy.world to defederate with feddit.de 1 year ago:
Pretty sure it’s calling for the displacement of all the Israeli people there.
“It’s just ethnic cleansing” isn’t really a great counter.
- Comment on Cutie patootie 1 year ago:
They’re such adorable little genetic dead-ends!
- Comment on Cutie patootie 1 year ago:
[Pug noise]
- Comment on Lemmy.world appears to have briefly logged me in as a completely different user (twice)? 1 year ago:
Haven’t seen it lately, no.
- Comment on Made one deadly slip 1 year ago:
You didn’t have to draw on me like that
- Comment on Made one deadly slip 1 year ago:
“Rarely” is not “never”, reaction is faster than conscious action by the study’s conclusions (just not fast enough to offset acting first), and, furthermore, in an actual shooting situation, the important thing is not to actually be the second to draw, but to provoke your own reaction regardless of whether the signal you react to (ie an errant twitch of the opponent’s fingers) is genuine or a false alarm.
- Comment on Made one deadly slip 1 year ago:
- Comment on Made one deadly slip 1 year ago:
National armies would literally line up facing each other in uniforms with literal X-marks-the-spot targets.
The reason for armies meeting up like that, and in bright colors, is to avoid friendly fire, not because of honor or anything like that. When you have a bunch of peasants dragged from their homes and shove a musket in their hands, anything more complex than “Holy shit, holy fucking shit, do NOT shoot or stab the guys in BRIGHT RED, only those in BRIGHT BLUE” tends to get lost in the chaos of battle.
- Comment on Made one deadly slip 1 year ago:
There’s no way to “fire early” because they are watching for you to reach for your gun.
The ‘conventional’ wisdom is to wait for the other duelist to reach for their gun because reflex is faster than conscious action.
- Submitted 1 year ago to greentext@sh.itjust.works | 37 comments
- Submitted 1 year ago to greentext@sh.itjust.works | 102 comments
- Comment on .world censorship? 1 year ago:
.world-based users will see it as censored.
- Comment on .world censorship? 1 year ago:
I would argue more generally that censoring words like this is unhelpful and counterproductive.
As seen in the link in the post body, not only can it inhibit clear communication, but anyone actually using the slur would be more clearly identified if the slur remained - thus allowing the mods to definitively identify the user as bigoted and banning them. Replacing it with ‘removed’ creates ambiguity in combating bigotry as well as edge cases and discussions of words - as in the linked case.
- Comment on .world censorship? 1 year ago:
Autocensoring words and replacing them with “removed”
- Submitted 1 year ago to support@lemmy.world | 17 comments
- Submitted 1 year ago to greentext@sh.itjust.works | 8 comments
- Submitted 1 year ago to science_memes@mander.xyz | 9 comments
- Submitted 1 year ago to science_memes@mander.xyz | 72 comments
