Submitted 3 days ago by ryujin470@fedia.io to [deleted]
Why the names of (real world, not made-up) video games and other media are usually changed when used in fiction?
In short, money.
To use the real name ould likely require licensing it. Not to mention that naming a game made by a company owned by one major media conglomerate, might be an issue when you’re a show made by a company owned by a different competing major media conglomerate.
Also - why advertise for free?
For live action TV its probably easier to just use retail units but for animation it allows them to use only they aspects they are interested in while not getting bogged down in the realities of the console/controller design or the actual gameplay scenarios.
Of course it also allows for the title to function as a joke too, and makes for a more rimless product than a current year pop culture reference.
kjira@lemmy.today 3 days ago
Probably to completely sidestep copyright / permission concerns. But can you give an example?
burgersc12@mander.xyz 3 days ago
WcDonalds is probably one of the most well known examples now, since McDonalds made it part of their bag for a few months. Image
FelixCress@lemmy.world 3 days ago
They were not wrong:
dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/wc
partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I think you’re touching on trademark infringement already with what you covered. I would also guess to remove any legal liability for slander/libel. There are legal protections for satire, but even that has limits. If you make a villain that kills people love a particular brand of burger that company could say you’re suggesting only criminals like their product opening up the author for a lawsuit.
kjira@lemmy.today 2 days ago
Right… and I really wanted the OP to give an example in case everyone was misunderstanding some nuance in what they were referring to.