Submitted 2 weeks ago by UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk to movies@lemm.ee
https://filmstories.co.uk/news/fantastic-four-first-steps-poster-seems-to-have-been-made-with-ai/
For fucks sake Disney? Too tight to pay a respectable artist?
Since this article ends with,
Hopefully, Disney can clarify this and assure the world it’s all deliberate. Because otherwise, a company that can afford to know and do better, hasn’t.
It’s worth saying that Marvel has denied it, thewrap.com/marvel-denies-fantastic-four-poster-a…
So there will likely be more to this story.
Who cares??? “Marcel didn’t pay someone $20k to make this poster.” It’s fucking AI - everybody uses it. We’re mad because a company, who makes movies for children, not adults, used AI for a poster? Oh no, the let down. Grow up, for fucks sake. You want your fiction more lifelike? ITS FUCKING FICTION you dunces.
Calm down please, this isn’t Reddit. Thank you.
What? What does any of this have to do with Reddit?
[Movies are a form of human art] + [Comics are a form of human art]
= Using AI to make the poster of a Movie based on a famous Comic is nothing less that a dick move.
(Ps. Marcel have fucking million on budget to pay an artist. This is at the very least a very worrying trend)
AI = wrong for creating fiction. CGI = Totally fine for creating fiction.
These movies are meant for children, and I guarantee children are not mad Marvel used AI to create a movie poster.
This has zero affect on me, because I’m an adult with responsibilities. Maybe shift your focus in life away from thuperheroeths.
Morally bankrupt companies might use AI, certainly not everybody.
They definitely paid someone to do this poster. A company like Marvel will not have some executive use an off-the-shelf AI to generate a poster. Someone got paid to create a poster, and that person did a bad job - no matter if it was a compositing error or an AI error.
I thought the general consensus was; “They own their business, they can do whatever they want” - If they let this slide through, it’s their decision, and they can make whatever decisions they choose.
ch00f@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I’m not convinced this is AI. If it was straight AI, there would be a lot more issues. Zoom in on any AI crowd and things go to hell quickly.
My guess is that this is a highly composited image with a handful of old fashioned human Photoshop errors.
UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
There’s too many issues with the image. For example, why does the brown coat have buttons when it looks like a poncho?
Image
ch00f@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Most of these “issues” are terrible arguments: 2) AI doesn’t duplicate heads. That’s kind of the whole point of AI. You know what does duplicate features? Lazy compositing. 6 and 9) Extras don’t know how to use 70 year old props? This is surprising? 8) We’re going to call out grammar errors, but ignore the flawless pencil drawing of the logo on the other poster?
burgersc12@mander.xyz 2 weeks ago
The fact that its even debatable if this so AI or not is concerning. What is generated and what is real anymore? Is this the Matrix? Can I take the blue pill and forget?!
ch00f@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I find this argument a little disingenuous. Debatable is subjective. Someone might just have a really, really poor argument. Not much of a debate.
Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Ah yes… human errors, like not getting the finger quantity correct.
This is AI.
ch00f@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The upper-most finger on the hand isn’t an index finger. See where it lands on the palm? The original hand was pointing and they poorly shopped it to make it look like it was holding something.
EarMaster@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Absolutely. There are no signs to me that this is AI. This is comped by some artist either with stock photography or with material from the set.