This headline should be “most computer users see little or no value in LLM and other technologies that are being branded as “AI” and never will”
Most iPhone owners see little to no value in Apple Intelligence so far
Submitted 4 days ago by remington@beehaw.org to technology@beehaw.org
Comments
Salvo@aussie.zone 4 days ago
HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 days ago
Outside of Gemini, Google has done a decent job at packaging AI features that have a tangible benefit to users. However, they seem to be more purpose built instead of LLM’s.
jarfil@beehaw.org 3 days ago
I find Gemini “somewhat useful”, on a smartphone. It’s not a game changer, but it can often answer the thing I want even when it misheard it, much better than Google Assistant.
dditty@lemm.ee 4 days ago
So far Apple Intelligence can help with writing, making pictures/emojis, and summarizing notifications, websites, emails, Messages, etc. I just don’t see a need for AI to do any of those tasks though. The picture one maybe
TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 4 days ago
Why would you need to summarize notifications? Usually each notification is just a short sentence, so there’s hardly anything you can do to shorten them further. Summarizing websites is far more useful though.
N0x0n@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
Update
i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 3 days ago
Not all notifications are short sentences. The most likely counter example is e-mails.
averyminya@beehaw.org 4 days ago
It’s the same for Samsung’s AI stuff, the only really useful one is it’s smart selecting features - cropping photos, taking out specific images for stickers/collaging.
Everything else though is just the creativity I want to do being done for me.
sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 3 days ago
I guess summarizing notifications is mildly useful. Other than that, it seems like they’re just embracing the current zeitgeist (or really, meme). I can’t believe the whole industry has become so head-over-heels enamored with LLMs. What a waste of talent, time and energy for so many people.
vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 days ago
They want AI because apple tells them they do.
They also don’t want AI because their experiences say the opposite.
SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 4 days ago
Thankfully both it and Siri can be completely disabled or just not even installed in the former’s case.
NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 days ago
Is this something I can dodge entirely by never buying a newer iPhone then?
TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 2 days ago
install Arch Linux on your phone now
TehPers@beehaw.org 4 days ago
We tried the iPhone 16 recently, upgrading from a 14. Apple’s AI seemed basically useless. That combined with the dynamic island not respecting reduced motion settings lead us to return the phone instead and keep the 14. The old phone worked fine, but we wanted to try to get ahead of the incoming administration just in case.
Maybe the 17 will be better?
veeesix@lemmy.ca 4 days ago
I found that Siri is a little more useful for answering questions with ChatGPT, but outside of that I don’t think I’ve come across another situation where I’ve needed Apple Intelligence.
circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 days ago
Same is true of many other AI assistants. They’re really neat as a technical exercise, or for a bit of fun for 10-20 minutes. But when it comes to folding them into workflows, the utility is harder to grasp.
Couple that with the extreme energy requirements of these systems, the worries about where the training data comes from, plus the fact that it feels like every single corporation is just flailing around “AI” because they see dollar signs… I’m pretty over it.
mara@pawb.social 3 days ago
Training GPT-3 (a model from 3 years ago) from scratch requires as much energy as is spent to raise two cows for meat.