This is the first I’m hearing of her book, it looks good and I’ve always liked Nana’s willingness to speak out. I will have to check it out.
Interview: Nana Visitor On Star Trek Putting Actresses In The “Female Box” And Going Backwards In ‘Enterprise’
Submitted 1 year ago by ValueSubtracted@startrek.website to startrek@startrek.website
Comments
Corgana@startrek.website 1 year ago
halm@leminal.space 1 year ago
Ooh, now I want to read the stuff that didn’t make it into the book, and the interviews that never got made for different reasons. How many copies do each of us need to buy for a sequel to be commissioned?
1SimpleTailor@startrek.website 1 year ago
Disappointed that Marina Sirtis wouldn’t interview, thought I kind of get why. Her role as a woman on Trek is certainly one of the more… complicated ones.
halm@leminal.space 1 year ago
For sure! That’s why I hope this book opens more conversations with Sirtis and others about their experience, whether it’ll be in a Visitor-penned sequel or elsewhere.
Specifically Sirtis would be interesting, because she so definitely was put in the “female box”, while her real (or convention appearance) persona is much fuller — and outspoken than the often docile role she played.
ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 1 year ago
When the book was initially announced, I didn’t think much of it, but it seems like Visitor really put a lot of work into this thing.
halm@leminal.space 1 year ago
Sounds like the publisher approached her to do a coffee table fluff book, and then she added her own critical feminist special sauce 🌶️🌶️🌶️
Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Wow, I wouldn’t even recognize her if I ran into her on the street. Did she get lip injections?
hOrni@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I think it’s more like, there’s been 30 years since DS9.
halm@leminal.space 11 months ago
That, and she doesn’t still wear the Bajoran nose ridge prosthetic…
frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
These interviews are really interesting! I’m going to have to go and read the book now.