[deleted]

Comments

• DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  “Rogues and Scoundrels” really doesn’t feel like it’s a good fit for Trek IP.

  Maybe I’ll be proven wrong.

  source

  • Fortyseven@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    There’s room for it, under the right conditions, but… this feels completely wrong in almost every direction. Section 31, as a collective group, should not feel like a bad rip off of Guardians of the Galaxy. Absolutely the wrong tone.

    I will give it a fair shot, however, since it won’t cost me anything but my time. :P

    source

    • ValueSubtracted@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Aside from the obvious space angle, it seems more like a “Suicide Squad” vibe to me, which makes a little more sense, I think.

      Their marketing tone is not what I expected at all, but I’m still interested in what the heck this thing will be.

      I just want a sense of what the actual story is.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    You probably won’t.

    source
• Solumbran@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Ah, amazing, one of the worst parts of the franchise brought into a movie, what’s not to love

  source
• askryan@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I have definitely been proven wrong by Star Trek things that look terrible at the outset, but…this looks terrible. I mean I guess we’re getting a Deltan, so that’s fun? And a chameloid is a bit of a deep cut? But jesus, I could not want to see this less. I hope I’ll be proven wrong!

  source
• fixmycode@feddit.cl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  why oh why does every character has an “archetype”?

  source

  • ValueSubtracted@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Why do they have basic attributes of fictional characters? Tough to say…

    source