Noise.

Comments

• qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Experimentalists: understood, say no more.

  Theorists: ok, show me the Hamiltonian…including the noise terms.

  source

  • fossphi@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Too real

    source
• fckreddit@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Where was the experiment run? On a battlefield?

  source

  • Droechai@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Setting up a bird listening device a few meters off an active runway and no filter for engine sounds.

    Play back is of course volume tuned for the bird chirps when processing data

    source
• Engywuck@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Nah… It’s just that “usually calculations overestimate the experimental values”.

  source
• Nooodel@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  • Hey boss, we have sincere troubles, SNR is off by too much.
  • how much?
  • 20dB
  • ah, then we’re good, that’s so ridiculous it’s def. a gain problem in your measurement setup

  source
• nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  The funny thing about RF work is how casually a few orders of magnitudes gets thrown around. 10 dB fudge factors for assorted losses are quite common.

  source