A thought prompted by seeing instances growing and struggling to have enough resources. Then and now, people in groups trying to communicate something. Hardware became incredibly faster over decades, storage became incredibly more huge, and software bloat kept pace?
Usenet plus voting, reputation, moderation by default, and a different content propagation model. Usenet died out for a variety of reasons, but unmitigated spam didn’t help. I’m hopeful lemmy with “ownership” of a community built in will foster more quality engagement.
The biggest hurdle I see is identity, asking people to create an account is lots of friction. Using existing identity providers (google, apple, microsoft, github, stackoverflow) would reduce the friction and let more people participate.
reddig33@lemmy.world 11 months ago
One difference is there’s no organizational hierarchy like there is on Usenet.
Another difference is that you can have fifteen different subs with the same name, confusing everyone, diluting contribution, and spurring multiple reposts of the same content in the “all” feed.
Other than that, it’s similar.
frevaljee@kbin.social 11 months ago
About the second point, it would be neat if "subs" could federate somehow.
flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
One challenge at a time, cuz!
I’m sure it’s in the roadmap, but the devs have all kinds of moderation headaches and other things that are far more important to ‘brew up’ first.
cerevant@lemmy.world 11 months ago
They can and do. Every sub has a unique name.
The complaint is that there isn’t a single entity who gets to decide which sub is the authoritative sub for a topic. Which is a feature, not a bug.
Communities will coalesce around certain subs that work, and they will rise up over the alternatives. We’re just in ego-land-grab mode right now.