I'm so annoyed that they're calling the new hobbit game 'A The Lord of the Rings Game'

Comments

• Odelay42@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Obviously “the” is a critical part of the trademark. Lawyers win that debate.

  But why did the marketers win the “a… game” debate?

  It could have been, “The Lord of the Rings: whatever whether Hobbit farm” and avoided all the weirdness.

  source

  • VerseAndVermin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That seems weirder to me to be honest. Like the recent The Lord of the Rings: Return to Moria. Just call if Return to Moria and make a LotR badge for marketings sake. Same here.

    I’ll accept Middle-Earth though.

    source

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      A Story from The Lord of the Rings: Tales of the Shire

      source
  • HKayn@dormi.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I can understand the decision somewhat.

    Putting “The Lord of the Rings” first in the title would imply that this furthers the main canon, when it’s actually only set in its universe.

    source
• RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Trademark moment

  source
• proper@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  “Tales from the Shire: A Lord of the Rings game” they probably just have a few “A Lord of the Rings game”(s) in the pipeline

  source

  • brian@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    So I missed it the first time. But the title is “A The Lord of the Rings Game”. Assumedly to maintain copyright, they did not drop the “The” from “The Lord of the Rings” even though they started with “A”

    source

    • catloaf@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      That would probably be trademark, not copyright.

      source
• SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Also, the trailer refers to Hobbits as “creatures” instead of “people.”

  What’s with a little fantasy dehumanization, eh, eh?

  source