LaTeX gang
Chicago Gang Rise Up
Submitted 6 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/508a3b94-f9af-43b3-ad05-03f3d8881ead.jpeg
Comments
LucidBoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 months ago
APA is where it’s at tho…
BigilusDickilus@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Agreed, APA is the most sensible and straightforward generally.
I will always have a soft spot for Turrabian though since it was what my undergraduate history dept used and I lived it when I was writing my thesis.
Isoprenoid@programming.dev 6 months ago
I find the lack of IEEE in this comment section disturbing.
expatriado@lemmy.world 6 months ago
there are dozen of us!
Katzastrophe@feddit.de 6 months ago
Currently preparing to write my Bachelor thesis, the format and template I need to use were last revised in 2009, I am going to lose all joy while writing, I can already tell
fossilesque@mander.xyz 6 months ago
Zotero
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
Yup, I installed Zotero and never thought about formatting citations again. Freed up more time to
browse Lemmydo research.Katzastrophe@feddit.de 6 months ago
Sourcing isn’t even the problem, just having to reformat everything all the time because Word (which I have to use) is a bitch is the annoying part
taiyang@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Take this propaganda meme back to your English major puppet masters, everyone knows APA is the superior and only true format.
… Unless the journal I’m publishing in says otherwise.
Infamousblt@hexbear.net 6 months ago
Drink enough Malort and MLA format starts making sense
affiliate@lemmy.world 6 months ago
is apa the one that makes you cite things in parentheses? because that one gets a thumbs down from me
FinalRemix@lemmy.world 6 months ago
It’s perfectly cromulent. C’mon. (Me, 2024)
veganpizza69@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I can confirm your observations (Me et al., 2024)
brasileiro@lemmy.eco.br 6 months ago
cries in ABNT format
weariedfae@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Style formats are SO undergrad, lol.
Except citations where it’s an obscure style that no widget knows by default.
Nerd geologist discussion about GSA style below. Scroll if you don’t care. Or just scroll and let me yammer into the void.
Did anybody else notice they changed the GSA citation style guidelines recently? I checked the link today and it was blue and I was like, what? I go to this website 500 times a year. They changed a bunch of stuff, what I noticed was they require co-lead scientists to be listed in the citation even when there are 15 coauthors and it should get an et al. They also say absolutely NO personal communications and NO unpublished works (not even in progress/ in publication/ etc.).
I get where they’re coming from but this is problematic in a community where a lot of knowledge is bound up in unpublished projects by the Old Guard who never quite seem to get around to it. I mean, sure, they’ll go out in the field with you and tell you everything they saw before and discuss things with you but the best you have is “personal communication with this expert who has been working in this area or formation for 52 years”.
Weird, man.