This article is not saying a lot tbh
Chatbot letdown: Hype hits rocky reality
Submitted 7 months ago by remington@beehaw.org to technology@beehaw.org
https://www.axios.com/2024/03/27/ai-chatbot-letdown-hype-reality
Comments
akrz@programming.dev 7 months ago
ptz@dubvee.org 7 months ago
Oh, wow. It really isn’t. Axios usually does really good reporting, but that looks more like the outline / notes for a story than something ready to publish.
Creesch@beehaw.org 7 months ago
For real, it almost felt like an LLM written article the way it basically said nothing. Also, the way it puts everything in bullet points is just jarring to read.
millie@beehaw.org 7 months ago
Frankly, corporations seem to have no idea how to use LLMs. They want them to be a public facing company representative, which is exactly what LLMs can’t do well. Where they accel is as an assistant.
Want to figure out what scale you’re playing a song in? It’s great at that. I’ve had it give me chords to go with scales too, or even asked for some scale options based on the feeling of the sound.
It’s also great for looking for terms in other languages. I’ve got some ranged weapon abilities in my tabletop rpg. I knew i wanted one of them to be called pistolero, but I didn’t know the terms fusilero or escopetero, and might not have found them on my own, but chatgpt came up with them right away.
If you have your own brain and want to off-load some simple queries, it’s great. If you want to use it in place of a human brain to talk to customers, you’re barking up the wrong gpt.
averyminya@beehaw.org 7 months ago
That music example is how I’ve used them, it really is spot on. Key, tempo, scale, overlapping scales that could be used, plus factoids included. It really can be very helpful.
noxfriend@beehaw.org 7 months ago
improving and integrating the technology is raising harder and more complex questions than first envisioned
Many people not only emvisioned but predicted these problems as soon as the hype cycle began.
Interesting article. I’d have loved to see some stats on how LLM investment and LLM startups are doing.
darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org 7 months ago
AI doesn’t have to be good, it only needs to be good enough. Even if it’s just barely functional, if it’s cheaper than paying a human, then it will be used by capitalists.
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 7 months ago
There are a handful of use cases I’ve seen generative AI be useful
And a few more probably.
I spent about 6 months deep diving into how it all worked. I was having dread that it would take my job and was determined to learn about it. What I learned is that there are many many serious pitfalls that seem to be more or less ignored or unknown by businesses and people covering it.
I won’t say it’s as bad as blockchain, there are usages for it, but the hype is pretty damn close. Business thinking it will save them billions and they can start getting rid of developers. Tech bros lining up to say it’s going to bring on the singularity.
Eh. It’s cool. I wouldn’t say it’s going to bring the second coming of Jesus.
Kichae@lemmy.ca 7 months ago
Literally the worst possible usage. They’re syntax generators, not search engines, and not knowledge fonts.
Creesch@beehaw.org 7 months ago
I don’t know how to say this in a less direct way. If this is your take then you probably should look to get slightly more informed about what LLMs can do. Specifically, what they can do if you combine them with with some code to fill the gaps.
Things LLMs can do quite well:
These are all the building blocks for searching on the internet. If you are talking about local documents and such retrieval augmented generation (RAG) can be pretty damn useful.
millie@beehaw.org 7 months ago
Gpt is fantastic at search. Like, check its work but it’ll check hundreds of pages of results way faster than you can.
Thorry84@feddit.nl 7 months ago
There may be exceptions but everything I’ve seen from AI programming is next level trash. It’s like copy pasting from Stack Overflow without the thousand comments all around it saying DO NOT DO THIS!
When ChatGPT was just released to the general public I wanted to try it out. I had it write a script to handle some simple parsing of network log files. I was having some intermittent issue with my home network I couldn’t figure out, so I had logged a lot of data and was hoping to figure out the issue. But I needed to filter out all the routine stuff that would be just noise in the background. I could have written it myself in about an hour, but figured hey maybe ChatGPT can help me bang it out in a couple of minutes.
The code it wrote looked at a glance to be very good and I was impressed. However as I read it, it turned out to be total nonsense. It was using variables and declaring them after. Halfway the script it seemed to have switched to a completely different approach leaving some sort of weird hybrid between the two. At one point it had just inserted pseudo code instead of actual functional code. Every attempt to get it to fix it’s issues just made it worse. In the end I just wrote the script myself.
I’ve seen examples from other people who attempted to use it and it’s just bad. It’s like having a junior programmer high on weed writing your code, checking it and fixing it takes more time than just writing the code itself.
Then there’s the issue of copyright, a lot of the training data wasn’t licensed and stuff like Github Copilot want to add your data to it’s training set if you want to use it. That’s not OK on many levels and not even possible for people working on corporate codebases.
A lot of programmers work on big code bases, with things like best practices and code standards. Not only does the AI not know the codebase and thus wouldn’t know how to do a lot of stuff in that codebase, it also doesn’t know about the best practices and code standards. So for those kinds of situations it isn’t useful.
I feel like people ask it to do some first year student programming tutorial tasks and the result looks somewhat like what one would expect and conclude the thing can actually write code. It really can’t in reality and probably shouldn’t even if it could.
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 7 months ago
That’s what I mean though. It helps give you different ideas, maybe looking at the problem a different way, but I don’t trust the garbage it spits out. At least half the time it makes something up, or it gives a solution that just won’t work, and even then it will double or even triple down on it.
gromnar@beehaw.org 7 months ago
Well said… Thanks for spelling it out!
kubica@kbin.social 7 months ago
I've only managed to find very basic info. For programming I got fed up of being recommended apps, features and settings that didn't exist.
OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 7 months ago
It’s good for anything that has thousands of examples on stack overflow.
For example, every time I end up trying to work with pandas, I always forget the syntax and it’s generally good here.
Anything unusual, or that is sufficiently complicated that I wouldn’t be able to Google for, and just forget it.
admiralteal@kbin.social 7 months ago
They are very useful for outlining and similar "where do I start" writing projects. They help break the dam and just get some damn words on the screen, at which point it's often easy to continue and flesh things out to a complete thought.
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org 7 months ago
It’s decent for generating ideas for names. I’ve used it for tabletop stuff a couple of times to give me NPC names or lists of personality traits, and it’s good sometimes for breaking writers block when I get stuck on some detail that I can’t figure out what word I want to use or what to name something. You can usually get it to give you some sort of okay suggestions, but the volume of ideas is usually enough to spark a better idea for me. The only weird thing I’ve noticed is that GPT4 (or whatever flavor bing/copilot is currently using) REALLY likes alliteration to a degree that is downright corny. It’s kinda weird but sort of funny honestly.
ptz@dubvee.org 7 months ago
I’ve refused to indulge in using them for searching. Do they cite their sources now? All I’ve seen are screenshots where it appears you’re just supposed to take their word for it. Curious if that’s changed.
FaceDeer@fedia.io 7 months ago
Bing Chat has become my go-to search engine for situations where I'm not looking for a specific website or other such resource, and instead want some kind of information or knowledge. I'd recommend giving it a shot. It does a websearch in the background, puts the results into its hidden context, and then builds an answer for you based on the information it dredged up, complete with links. You can then clarify your question or ask for further details and get a back-and-forth going, it's really handy. I'd recommend giving it a shot, I believe it works without needing an account now.
Shamot@jlai.lu 7 months ago
Some like Phind or Perplexity cite their sources. And they give you directly the answer you’re looking for without having to search it in a mess of “subscribe to our newsletter”, “other articles that may interest you”, 3 paragraphs of “if you read this article, you will know what you want to know”, “special promotion for you”,…