In some instances, absolutely.
Comment on Performative Perp Walk
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 12 hours agoAmerican soldiers regularly painted imagery and words on the bombs and vehicles they use to kill people. Are they terrorists too?
lud@lemm.ee 12 hours ago
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 12 hours ago
I mean I’d agree lol but I doubt this person equates Luigi and the average American soldier painting a bomb. That’s my point
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
I mean, yes. But folks here aren’t ready for that conversation
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 11 hours ago
Don’t worry I agree lol
bitjunkie@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Yes
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 9 hours ago
sigh yes you’re the third or fourth person to make this joke. Yes I agree.
The point is that nobody calls them terrorists for doing that. Putting words or art on weapons and ammo is considered “normal” as twisted as that is. So Luigi’s doing it does not make him a terrorist.
bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Yeah I mean it’s obviously trumped-up bullshit in his case, they’re making a point of throwing the book at him any way they can because the owners got their jimmies rustled
Jyek@sh.itjust.works 12 hours ago
The military is political. It is literally policy when the military moves. Anything any military does is dictionary terrorism. But terrorism is a nasty word for it so we don’t call it that.
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 11 hours ago
Makes sense