The "censorship" from before Musk took over was mostly banning hate speech, death threats, and calls for violence. Sometimes all three were in the same tweet.
Now it's banning union organizing and people wanting to be paid a fair wage for a day's work. Totally the same.
dmonzel@lemmy.world 1 year ago
JasSmith@kbin.social 1 year ago
You’re confusing the U.S. Constitution with free speech. The Constitution only prospects some kinds of free speech, and only for American citizens. I’m not American. Most people are not America. Surely you realise there are many others countries out there, and other kinds of speech?
You say “harmful” speech has not place in the public square. Who adjudicates that? Right now it’s Elon Musk. Are you really happy with that?
thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 1 year ago
What government purchased X? Surely you’re mistaking that with a private entity purchasing it. No part of X is public, it is and has always been a private site with membership requirements.
dmonzel@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Again, "free speech* doesn’t apply to what companies allow on their platforms.
I listed examples of harmful speech, literally one sentence after the phrase “harmful speech”.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The constitution is there to protect us from the government. Other laws are there to protect us from each other.
glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
That’s the “American and legal” version of free speech. Was there. No free speech before they wrote the constitution ?
SheeEttin@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Correct, there was not. For example, see the case of Zenger and the New York Weekly Journal.
Even today, the UK does not have the same freedom of speech as the US. For example: independent.co.uk/…/abolish-the-monarchy-proteste…