You are incorrect. The service is providing someone a home if they don’t want to own their own or if they don’t have the financial means to do so
No landlords hoard property. The property is used by people.
You are incorrect. The service is providing someone a home if they don’t want to own their own or if they don’t have the financial means to do so
No landlords hoard property. The property is used by people.
zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Fine, landlords hoard property ownership.
As long as the landlord permits it, and as long as the landlord gets their premium.
Landlords profit off of permitting people access to shelter, a basic right that any human should be entitled to. It’s literally modern day feudalism.
puck2@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Renters hoard property rentership.
nomy@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
You have to actually consider what the other person is saying if you want to have a productive conversation. Being snarky or just responding with memes and cliches only distracts from the point being made.
mke_geek@lemm.ee 1 week ago
No, landlords earn money by providing a service. Properties don’t maintain themselves.
zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Taking away the opportunity of home ownership is not a service.
mke_geek@lemm.ee 1 week ago
That’s not what rental property owners do. They provide housing, not take it away.
darreninthenet@lemmy.sdf.org 1 week ago
So let’s say a landlord sells their property and somebody else buys it to live in.
Where do the original renters live now?
Or in a rental property, who is paying to maintain it if the landlord is not charging above their mortgage costs?
Or why would a landlord take on the risk of loaning an expensive asset to somebody at cost knowing they may not get paid? Or the boiler stops working and they have to spend thousands fixing it without any risk to the tenant?