Comment on Indian start-up Yes Madam fires employees who indicated being stressed in the survey

s3p5r@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

• huginn@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  That email is company wide, not specific to those fired

  source

  • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Yes, but you always BCC large groups like that to prevent reply-all disasters.

    source

    • Gork@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      I was once on a massive reply-all chain. Most of the emails were “stop replying all!” But one made me chuckle. “I like these emails it makes me feel important.”

      source

      • scytale@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        My favorite was when someone from HR finally replied and asked everyone to stop replying to all or else. Then one guy replied “Ok” to all.

        source
      • Sprinks@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        I was once in a reply all email chain where one person got so irrate at everyone else that a subreddit was created just to post memes about this person. I wish I could remember the sub name, but it was years ago and the sub probably isnt there anymore anyway.

        source
    • huginn@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      100% - it’s obviously a company run by slack jawed morons but the original comment had assumed it was only those affected getting the email, which is a different context

      source
  • Stovetop@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    It’s normally standard to send mass emails using BCC to avoid someone using the Reply All button to spam up people’s inboxes.

    source

    • huginn@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Totally - just pointing out that implied in the first comment was those included in the email were the fired ones when that’s not the case

      source
  • s3p5r@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Ah you’re right, I missed the “impacted employees will receive” line. Tired skimming fails again.

    source

    • huginn@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Easy mistake to make - it wasn’t exactly front and center

      source