Findings: Air bacterial counts in close proximity to hand drying were 4.5-fold higher for the jet air dryer (70.7 cfu) compared with the warm air dryer (15.7 cfu) (P=0.001), and 27-fold higher compared with use of paper towels (2.6 cfu) (P<0.001).* Airborne counts were also significantly different during use of towel drying versus warm air dryer (P=0.001). A similar pattern was seen for bacterial counts at 1m away. Visualization experiments demonstrated that the jet air dryer caused the most droplet dispersal.
They used a jet air dryer, those are the shitty ones that spray everything everywhere. Of course it’ll be worse. I’d like to see how a dyson air blade hold up under that kind of test.
Mannivu@feddit.it 4 months ago
Unfortunately it is very much true.
daddy32@lemmy.world 4 months ago
This is not hot air though, so the cited source does not apply.
Mannivu@feddit.it 4 months ago
You’re right and I linked a fairly old study. I’ve edited my comment to add a more recent source.
daddy32@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Kudos.
kautau@lemmy.world 4 months ago
SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Isn’t the point to get bacteria off your hands? Isn’t it better to have them in the air than on your hands?
It’s a lot more likely I’ll eat something I touched than something that’s been sitting in bathroom air.
Artyom@lemm.ee 4 months ago
They used a jet air dryer, those are the shitty ones that spray everything everywhere. Of course it’ll be worse. I’d like to see how a dyson air blade hold up under that kind of test.