Luckily, they didn’t really bother making a sequel, they just remade the original and pretended it was a new film.
demesisx@infosec.pub 2 weeks ago
I mean, did people expect anything good from a sequel to a movie that literally didn’t need a sequel?
Emperor@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
demesisx@infosec.pub 2 weeks ago
Wow. Even worse! Haha.
Emperor@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
Especially as some of the recycled plot points make no sense with the slightly tweaked setting.
dumblederp@aussie.zone 2 weeks ago
What is this Avatar? New blue, new you.
keyez@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Couldn’t even do a new biome smh
MimicJar@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I mean Blade Running 2049 is the rare lone exception to being a good sequel to a movie that didn’t need a sequel.
Maybe someday another film will achieve what it did, so I gotta keep hoping, but I know it isn’t likely.
niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Speaking of Ridley Scott.
But then in an astute creative move, the sequel was put in the hands of one of the truly best directors working today, in fact it could be said that Dennis Villeneuve is the Ridley Scott of his day. Like Michael Mann has been the John Ford of his day.
Although Villeneuve so far has been a guarantee of quality both in content and presentation, while Scott’s erratic career is sprinkled with quite a few mediocre efforts and misfires, like he gets easily distracted, and you can even get a whiff of that in the way he fidgets unnecessarily with his older movies (speaking of Blade Runner) like Lucas did with the Star Wars original trilogy.
skeezix@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
You mean that?
MimicJar@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
On average I do.