I looked through a few articles but couldn’t find anything about a term that would shutdown Palworld just because Nintendo won the lawsuit.
The worst case scenario would be something like Palworld having to change their “Pal Spheres” into “Pal Cubes” or prisms, or something similar.
Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
There was a request to halt sales until the specific mechanics were removed, with the mechanics being throwing pokeball like items and riding monsters.
olafurp@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Trying do ban riding fictional animals is a tall order
SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Fuck it, have Nintendo sue blizzard whole they’re at it. I want to see a nerd bloodbath.
echodot@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Blizzard of course can’t sue anyone because that would require an original idea to copyright.
ICastFist@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
ackshually 🤓
One of the patents was for seamlessly transitioning from one type of ride to another, as it happens in Legends Arceus, ie: jumping into the water while riding the stag will automatically change to the giant piranha. The irony here is that palworld lacks anything like that, you never transition between 2 different mounts without player input. The closest to that is using some pals as gliders, but you’ll just get back on your feet once you touch the ground or water.
Another patent was for throwing stuff at enemies in order to begin combat. They’re all hard reads, mostly because they read like they’re describing how Legends Arceus works in minute detail.
echodot@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Are Nintendo suing reality now? I must admit, it would be very on brand for them.