Comment on Palworld announces Terraria crossover
Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks agoThat lawsuit might take years, and the requested damages from Nintendo are only $66,000. Palworld isn’t going to be shut down anytime soon, even if they lose the case.
lowleveldata@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
The request includes a term to shutdown Palworld IIRC
Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
There was a request to halt sales until the specific mechanics were removed, with the mechanics being throwing pokeball like items and riding monsters.
olafurp@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Trying do ban riding fictional animals is a tall order
SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Fuck it, have Nintendo sue blizzard whole they’re at it. I want to see a nerd bloodbath.
ICastFist@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
ackshually 🤓
One of the patents was for seamlessly transitioning from one type of ride to another, as it happens in Legends Arceus, ie: jumping into the water while riding the stag will automatically change to the giant piranha. The irony here is that palworld lacks anything like that, you never transition between 2 different mounts without player input. The closest to that is using some pals as gliders, but you’ll just get back on your feet once you touch the ground or water.
Another patent was for throwing stuff at enemies in order to begin combat. They’re all hard reads, mostly because they read like they’re describing how Legends Arceus works in minute detail.
QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I looked through a few articles but couldn’t find anything about a term that would shutdown Palworld just because Nintendo won the lawsuit.
The worst case scenario would be something like Palworld having to change their “Pal Spheres” into “Pal Cubes” or prisms, or something similar.
echodot@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
The Pallnoctahedron. “It’s a totally different shape and it’s just the fact that it’s very small, and we enabled smooth shading, that makes it look like we haven’t done anything to it.”
ms_lane@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
In Japan.
With the money they’ve made already, they could move the team to US, where none of this would fly.
echodot@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
They would still have to face the courts in Japan if they want to sell in Japan.
Your line of thinking is the same thing that X fell for with Brazil. Just because you don’t have your HQ in a particular country doesn’t mean the legal system can be ignored. Otherwise the EU wouldn’t be gifting fines to Google and Apple every 15 minutes.