Comment on Supreme Court hearing case on definition of a woman

TachyonTele@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  How are they gonna answer this question? None of them are biologists.

  source

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That’s not a problem for them. Six of them will vote in a horrible way, and the remaining three will detail why that’s such a horrible decision.

    source

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      There are 12 justices on the UK Supreme Court, or did you not read the article even a little?

      source

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Ha! No I did not. Damnit.

        source
  • Asafum@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Oh you haven’t heard of Chevron Deference yet have you!

    That’s the great part, we stopped those pesky experts from having any say anymore so no more interpretation of the intention of a vague law from the EPA or FDA! Now the courts get to decide what the allowed amount of Acrylamide, Phthalates, Perchlorate, Potassium bromate, and Azodicarbonamide, should be in foods and the like if a legal challenge is brought against a company!

    I’m sure good ol’ Thomas definitely understands what Azodicarbonamide is and how it affects the body!

    source

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Lol i did the same thing

      source
• MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Oh girl

  source