Supreme Court hearing case on definition of a woman

Comments

• TachyonTele@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Oh boy

  source

  • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    How are they gonna answer this question? None of them are biologists.

    source

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      That’s not a problem for them. Six of them will vote in a horrible way, and the remaining three will detail why that’s such a horrible decision.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • Asafum@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Oh you haven’t heard of Chevron Deference yet have you!

      That’s the great part, we stopped those pesky experts from having any say anymore so no more interpretation of the intention of a vague law from the EPA or FDA! Now the courts get to decide what the allowed amount of Acrylamide, Phthalates, Perchlorate, Potassium bromate, and Azodicarbonamide, should be in foods and the like if a legal challenge is brought against a company!

      I’m sure good ol’ Thomas definitely understands what Azodicarbonamide is and how it affects the body!

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Oh girl

    source
• Anticorp@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  [deleted]

  source

  • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Americans?

    source

    • Anticorp@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Whoops! I arrived from All while having morning coffee, as you can tell.

      source