You underestimate the effects of population growth. There was a lot of time in prehistory but the population at any given point was tiny compared to today.
Comment on Anon's uncle is sick
Joeffect@lemmy.world 1 day agoIt’s more than that… I know you were joking but …
…wikipedia.org/…/Estimates_of_historical_world_po…
Yeah it’s estimated but it’s a shit ton of people so it’s more like 99.9%
taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Num10ck@lemmy.world 1 day ago
i remember an old article that said DNA shows that all current humans can be traced back to 7 women during the ice age.
meowMix2525@lemm.ee 1 day ago
There were probably more around at the time, all the other bloodlines just died off.
tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
And they were all neighbours in the same age and shared a WhatsApp group.
Joeffect@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Those people were alive and died it doesn’t matter… There have been more people dead than are currently living by a lot.
We don’t care how many people were alive back than compared to today. It’s the total amount to how many have died…
taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
We don’t care how many people were alive back than compared to today.
But that is exactly the ratio you claim to be 99.9% when in reality it is closer to 93%.
Joeffect@lemmy.world 1 day ago
No your right, my bad I’m terrible at math and sick
Dalvoron@lemm.ee 12 hours ago
Hang on there based on the image, 7.95 billion alive today, 109 billion have lived and died, that’s like 93% death rate not 99.9%. Is there some other figure on the page you’re basing the 99.9% off?