And it’s not on me to find the burden of truth for you. That’s a logical fallacy and a bad arguing tactic
FFS I wasn’t trying to argue with you. Since you quoted some very specific numbers, I thought that you had done some recent research on the matter, and thus had an up to date knowledge of the current studies. In that case copy pasting said references from endnote should have taken 30 seconds and provided the community with a lot of valuable info.
I wasn’t trying to get you to search for studies that would back up your claims, I thought you had them already.
Why does asking for citations equal arguing? Where did I even hint that I thought you were wrong? I very much tried to make my intentions clear, yet everyone still think that I’m some smuck smart-ass trying to win an argument … an argument I wasn’t even part of to begin with.
uranibaba@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Is it not the one who claims something that has the burden of proof? I’m confused.
Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days ago
I’d say it’s more a burden for the person making the claim that goes against reality. Imminent death is not in the least a common progression of getting knocked out.
adj16@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Yes. The OP of this thread needs to back up their claim that getting knocked out will kill you