child
Obviously babies cant vote but i find it weird how zionist we are about a magic age number to mark full maturity.
We allow demented elders to become president so why not also lets kids vote, its their future.
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 3 days ago
Because signing a petition isn’t voting. First and foremost voting should be anonymous. Secondly voting should be secret. Combine these with online voting from an unsecured location where your spouse could coerce you into voting for their candidate and it becomes a security nightmare.
On top of that voting should be transparent. With simple paper ballots any child, idiot and elderly person, every citizen can understand how it works. YOU can keep an eye on the whole process to make sure everything is counted and reported correctly. This isn’t a theoretical possibility. People actually do that. And that way irregularities do get spotted.
webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 days ago
B312@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Because not all kids know better and are far more gullible than the average adult
Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 days ago
Yes, because surely all adults know better, that’s why they so frequently swallow propaganda and vote against their own interests.
It’s controversial and it has its own problems with enforcement, but it often seems like there should be some kind of civics and media literacy test before voting. Of course, whoever is administering the test is going to have their own biases and agendas, so it’s no magic bullet solution.
There’s a vast gulf in maturity between children at different ages, and everyone develops at their own pace. Some thirteen year olds are more mature than many eighteen year olds, and some forty year olds needed more time to cook but they still graduated anyway.
gvasco@discuss.tchncs.de 3 days ago
Simple clear ballots right!?
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 3 days ago
Well, we do know that the US isn’t a functioning democracy.
Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 days ago
Combine these with online voting from an unsecured location where your spouse could coerce you into voting for their candidate and it becomes a security nightmare.
Uh like postal voting from home? This should not be a serious concern.
Enoril@jlai.lu 3 days ago
It is still a valid concern here and it’s why we still vote physically.
We also put our paper choice in a envelope, operation done from a one person polling booth. People in the voting room make sure everyone, including couples, are not watching or forcing a choice to another.
The vote is always done the Sunday to give the time for the most people to go voting (a lot of enterprises and shops are closed the Sunday). And if you work, your boss can’t block you to leave few hours for voting.
Takumidesh@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Don’t mail in voting concepts kind of contradict a lot of these points?
IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
Mail in votes requires physical access to tamper with, anyone in the world can hack an internet connection and tamper with votes.
TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 3 days ago
You could summarize the whole transparency thing into just one word: trust. As long as people trust that everything is fine, the society can continue to function. When people loose trust, everything falls apart.
If you can convince millions of people that the voting system works and is fair, you can have a democratic society. If not, you might want to look into alternatives such as totalitarian dictatorship, monarchy or even post apocalyptic absolute chaos.