Comment on Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy
neidu2@feddit.nl 1 month ago
And even the study can easily be proven wrong. A finite amount of monkeys already produced Shakespeare in a finite amount of time; it took roughly 25 million years.
BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 1 month ago
Primates ≠ monkeys
Enkrod@feddit.org 1 month ago
If baboons and macaques are monkeys, and if howlermonkeys and spidermonkeys are monkeys, humans MUST be monkeys.
Because they can ONLY both be monkeys if their common ancestor was also a monkey and we share that very same common ancestor. In fact we are closer related to macaques and baboons than to spidermonkeys.
Humans are apes, apes are a subgroup of monkeys, monkeys are a subgroub of primates.
GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Monkeys are a social construct. Like trees.
lemonmelon@lemmy.world 1 month ago
If trees aren’t real, how can our birds be real?
…I am so sorry
Enkrod@feddit.org 1 month ago
Simiformes is a clear and distinct clade.
There is no such thing for trees, because “tree” is a botanical classification, not a cladistical one.
Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Monkeys are specifically non-ape simians.
RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 1 month ago
We’re all apes
CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
And apes are monkeys
pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 1 month ago
If you go back far enough they do.