Comment on ...

• Honytawk@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Climate Change has existed for over 110 years in science.

  Image

  source

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    just the start, too.

    scientificamerican.com/…/exxon-knew-about-climate…

    …georgetown.edu/…/defense-denial-and-disinformati…

    theconversation.com/what-big-oil-knew-about-clima…

    motherjones.com/…/desmog-fossil-fuel-industry-cli…

    source
• Leviathan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Neither of those things were backed by science. Confusing convincing lobbying with science is a problem today was it was then.

  source
• Antiproton@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  There was never any science saying “cigarettes are healthy”.

  source

  • dariusj18@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Define healthy. Nicotine is a stimulant and does improve mental acuity.

    source
• Draconic_NEO@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I mean those things didn’t change, it was just about how research was manipulated by money and human biases.

  source

  • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    The truth doesn’t change. Scientific consensus does. Scientific consensus has been wrong on countless things. After all, science is about getting things a little less wrong every time.

    source

    • Draconic_NEO@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Exactly.

      source
  • SparrowHawk@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Yes but science is a process, not a thing, and that process is corruptible.

    There is a differentiation between the natural world for how it’s made and the human process that quantifies that knowledge.

    Science has always changed, just like human culture did

    source