Comment on Cheeky

• el_abuelo@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  ChatGPT? Then everyone should assume this is horse shit until verified.

  source

  • TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Equus simplicidens, also known as the Hagerman horse, lived around 4 million years ago in North America and is considered an ancestor of modern horses, zebras, and donkeys[3][5]. These animals relied on speed, stamina, and herd behavior for protection against predators such as early wolves and big cats[3]. Their survival was supported by strong social structures and collective awareness[3]. Over time, Equus species migrated to other continents via land bridges[4]. They eventually went extinct in North America around 10,000 years ago during the Pleistocene extinction event[1][2][4]. Horses were later reintroduced to the continent by humans in the late 15th century[4].

    Citations: [1] POST-PLEISTOCENE HORSES (EQUUS) FROM MÉXICO …allenpress.com/…/POST-PLEISTOCENE-HORSES-EQUUS-F… [2] Horses in North America: A Comeback Story | Blog | Nature - PBS pbs.org/…/american-horses-horses-in-north-america… [3] The Hagerman Horse (Equus simplicidens) - National Park Service www.nps.gov/articles/000/equus_simplicidens.htm [4] Wild Horses as Native North American Wildlife awionline.org/…/wild-horses-native-north-american… [5] Park Archives: Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument npshistory.com/publications/hafo/index.htm [6] American Zebra (Equus simplicidens) - iNaturalist www.inaturalist.org/…/317782-Equus-simplicidens [7] Hagerman Horse - Start Packing Idaho www.startpackingidaho.com/blog/hagerman-horse/

    source

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      So, what, did ChatGPT just rip this off wikipedia?

      source

      • Voyajer@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I have no doubt that the majority of LLM models have trained on Wikipedia articles

        source
      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I do have a custom instruction to use Wikipedia as a source where possible.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Yes. If you check the other top Google results you’ll frequently find the articles they plagiarized.

        source
  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    My teachers used to say the same about Wikipedia.

    I did edit heavily, this is 3 outputs combined including a fact check this using Wikipedia

    It does not fail on such basic questions, “fact check this:” in a new instance works more reliably then asking a human.

    source

    • sukhmel@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I think the hate is a bit unwarranted, but be wary that it does sometimes fail anything

      source
    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      and they’re correct about not using wikipedia as a source, you use wikipedia as a summary and then verify the information in the ACTUAL sources it cites

      source