Doesn’t matter if it’s “dead” or not, it’s not really meant to be a massively multiplayer game.
zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Meanwhile I avoided playing because I wanted to wait until it was out of early access and had its full release… Seems like I’ll either never get that, or by the time I do, the game will already be dead
SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 5 days ago
WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days ago
same
Madnessx9@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Same boat, waiting for 1.0, now worried I’ll miss the boat entirely, but I’m not going to buy their early access for that fear mongering. They made millions, they can ensure their game lives on one way or another.
bastionntb@lemmy.ml 5 days ago
If it’s dead by then, it wouldn’t have been a good investment. I’d rather not waste time in a game that won’t live past the hype.
essteeyou@lemmy.world 5 days ago
I feel like I already got way more than my money’s worth out of the game, and I’m happy to have moved on to other games. Not every game has to last forever.
ampersandrew@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Any game that doesn’t last forever was robbed of doing so arbitrarily. If they never updated Palworld again, in its current form, it will last forever.
Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 5 days ago
That’s not really true… No closed source software that isn’t actively developed should be expected to last forever. Eventually the binaries will get to the point where nothing will run them.
You also can’t emulate Windows. Maybe you could virtualize Linux and use wine, but even that is a tall order for “forever”.