I think it is logarithmic, it’s just marked linearly.
Comment on Lord of the Rings Characters: Screen Time vs. Mentions in the Books
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 months ago
The scale is neither linear nor logarithmic. What?
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 months ago
Logarithmic cannot start at 0 and would have equal spacing between 500, 1000 and 2000.
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
That’s not equal spacing - 1000-1500 is a bit longer than 1500-2000.
The graph is almost certainly logarithmic. Only the markings are stupid.
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 months ago
Every time a number doubles (or increases 10×, or 𝑒×, whatever), it moves a constant distance on a log scale because its base-whatever logarithm increases by a constant amount.
Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
Because the point isn’t to compare 2 characters, but to see how one character performs in the books and in the movies.
And for that, it doesn’t matter. But they could have used a bar graph instead.
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 months ago
Well, I’d like to know if Arwen’s screentime/mention ratio is 2x or 3x that of the Frodo baseline. This arbitrary scale makes it impossible. It would not hurt to add more values to the axes, and perhaps a faint grid.
bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 2 months ago
How else can you make it look like a linear grouping?
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 months ago
Data processing isn’t about making it look like something unless you are purposefully manipulating it.
bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 1 month ago
But that’s what happened here. The x-axis has been unevenly distributed.