What? No, you’re seeing masks because of the surge in covid. Article was updated to say Amazon is refuting the claim. It’s bogus.
Comment on Amazon Bans Its Drivers From Moving Their Own Lips Too Much At Work
Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Maybe this is why I have been seeing more drivers wearing masks.
heyoni@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
You forgot to put Amazon in your username, I thought they required that from paid shills
heyoni@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
Is everyone who points out misinformation a shill? Quit being a fucking moron, look at the article yourself. Stating facts does not equal endorsement.
EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Instantly buying Amazon’s denial of shit that it was proven they were trying to do does equal endorsement XP you should stop wasting time defending corporations who literally only give a shit about you for your money and data
TommySoda@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
/s
heyoni@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
What the fuck does that even mean?
TommySoda@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It means you were being sarcastic. Usually people put it at the end of a comment to emphasize they weren’t being serious.That’s the only reason I can think of why you said that.
solsangraal@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
couldn’t amazon just tap into the audio feed then?
xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
The real question is… why the fuck should anyone be micromanaged to this fucking extent. It’s probably hurting actual productivity… even if their broken ass metrics are showing an improvement.
It fucking sucks to be deprived of the joy in what you do - there isn’t much joy in delivery to begin with but vibing to the music while driving down an empty stretch of road is one of the little ones… the more you suck the joy out of a job the less shits your employees will give.
eramseth@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Heard about this a while back. I think the real explanation is that amazon wants cameras in their vehicles to monitor their drivers. But Amazon’s insurer says “if you have this video we want to see it, and if your drivers are distracted in general, your insurance rates are going up” and/or when there’s an incident, any evidence of distracted driving will be leveraged against amazon… so instead of getting rid of the cameras, they are micromanaging their employees not to be distracted while driving, where “distracted” includes talking on the phone and also singing or speaking.
It’s all really shitty tbh.
I get that with a company as big as Amazon, small margins can make a big difference, but… pretty sure that’s just an argument against giant fucking companies running everything…
solsangraal@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
maybe it’s because the more time wage slaves are thinking about not being allowed to sing, the less time they’re thinking about how shitty the pay is
TommySoda@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Even slaves were allowed to sing.
TheFriar@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
I feel like the more workers are generally miserable, the more they’ll be disgruntled
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
They’re not actually monitoring that specific thing. They have a camera looking at the drivers and the recognition software happens to interpret singing as the driver being “distracted”, but they don’t actually want to modify the software so they are doubling down on what the software has decided.
heyoni@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
They called me a shill for pointing that out lol.
FarFarAway@startrek.website 2 weeks ago
Kinda the same way my car tells me I’m not looking at the road if I tilt my head 2 inches to the side or back. Its constantly giving me warning, and I’m constantly yelling that I am looking at the road! How else could I go around this turn!
At least I have the option of covering it with black electrical tape. Jeeze.
DrPop@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
As someone who wears glasses I have to turn my head to check my mirrors. I would get so frustrated with that.
eramseth@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
This isn’t right. Singing also counts as distracted.
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
Debatable.
Should car radios be illegal then?