Comment on Are there any differences between hosting a .onion site and a “normal” site?
db2@lemmy.world 3 months ago
What’s the point? If your server goes down they both do, you’re not adding any value by having it on Tor.
Comment on Are there any differences between hosting a .onion site and a “normal” site?
db2@lemmy.world 3 months ago
What’s the point? If your server goes down they both do, you’re not adding any value by having it on Tor.
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 3 months ago
It adds extra privacy for people who value such.
Many domains actually host both.
linearchaos@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I screwed around on tor the other day for the first time in a long time, most onion sites I could find were down. The only thing that worked fine was Wikipedia LibGen and a few other places out of hundreds deadlinks.
marx2k@lemmy.world 3 months ago
That’s how I remember it as well. It was a frustrating mess of dead sites or sites that looked like they were created in 1993 and loaded with the speed of a BBS coming through a 1200 baud modern
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 months ago
How do you host both?
Azzu@lemm.ee 3 months ago
You simply follow the steps for both. But when it says in the steps to set up a webserver, instead of using 2 different webservers, you use 1.
electro1@infosec.pub 3 months ago
The question is can governments figure out where the server location is ? like their r extensions which allow u to c where the website is hosted
twistypencil@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Such as Facebook