Yep, a close friend of mine managed to be an established content creator with brand deals. I won’t go into specifics as it’s quite easy to extrapolate who the person are, but many people that are our mutual friends already started to think that “If [redacted] can manage to be a content creator then I must too” and started to clout chase.
Comment on YouTube Binges
Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks agoYeah becoming popular enough on YouTube to be able to have it be your full time job is like winning the lottery in terms of how many people have tried vs how many have succeeded.
sheogorath@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 4 weeks ago
Does your friend enjoy the work? People don’t appreciate how much work it is, and how difficult it can be to have your channel become successful enough to be a job (especially if you start out making stuff that you enjoy)
sheogorath@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Sorry for the late reply, to answer your question is based on my discussion with them regarding their content creation is that they view it as a job now. At first, they worked their ass of producing content. But now they got their own team that helps with content creation. The niche that they’re focusing are enjoyable enough but it can lead to parasocial relationships with their followers. It’s been to the point that if they have to wear the typical sunglasses + mask + hoodie in order to remain incognito in public.
Luckily they understood that content creating is not a permanent job and has been saving and investing their money so that they can retire a la Pewdiepie.
emenl@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
It seems to rise to the top of YouTube, you have to be a crazed sociopath or just plain idiotic to engage enough people to be able to afford a house. I think college is overrated but still think those that try are better off. Youtubers are not in anyway contributing to the betterment of our world. It’s sad how crap content is the driving force for getting monetized.
srestegosaurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
College is overrated? How so?
I think it does depend on the degree but at least here it leaves you with a far better prospect.
emenl@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Looking at my friends kids who have completed college in the last ten years, I can safely say that 70% of them are worst off than if they didn’t go. How did I come to that conclusion? Well they are so riddled with debt it’s going to take them at least 10 years, if not more to dig themselves out of that due to the college experience. Are they more educated? I would say yes but their outlook on life is so grim compared to the other kids who didn’t go to college and jumped directly working into trades. Those kids I see are happier and doing better in life. Again, this is just from my experiences. True it all depends on the degrees and the person itself but still doesn’t change my opinion on thinking college is overrated now.
srestegosaurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
That sucks a lot. As I mentioned on another reply here it’s not needer to take any debt in order to go to college. I forgot about how it works on other places, mb.
MutilationWave@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
They went into debt for a lot of fucking experience.
jaybone@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Yeah if you’re getting a science degree I think that helps.
If you’re getting a degree in something like french renaissance literature or basket weaving, you’ll probably have a harder time.
srestegosaurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
Oh, totally agree.
Humanities are treated like shit by our materialist society. It’s engineering or being a teacher.
Also, I’m not from the USA so I don’t need to get into perpetual dept to study which might be something yo consider.
SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
Sadly, the sociopath/idiotic formula does seem to resonate with the algorithms and/or the public. There is a local creator that I know to be a thoughtful, well-rounded person, yet they had to reduce themselves to a cartoon caricature in order to get traction. But that approach seems to have worked out for them, at least initially through Tik Tok and YouTube. Now I see them taking on increasingly sketchy sponsorships as their 15 minutes fades. And of course audience capture indisputably steers media makers into conspiratorial niches they can’t escape without sacrificing views/payout. Authenticity be damned.
Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
It’s kinda ironic, but the best creators I’ve come across seem to be ones that aren’t in it for the money.
Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
I think this says more about the dross you watch than anything else. Surely you’re not going to argue that someone like Tom Scott, Project Farm, or Torque Test Channel don’t add something of value to the world?
emenl@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
No I’m subscribed to Tom Scott and Project Farm in fact! Unfortunately I feel useful stuff like that is in the minority on YouTube. Try looking at the top videos on a guest account. That’s all the crap I’m referring to. A lot of mindless drivel
Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
Sure, but that’s the case with any type of entertainment. Half of any bestsellers list is either smut, or something like Jack Reacher novels. The Office is one of the most watched TV series ever, and it’s hardly high brow entertainment.
suction@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Because houses are waaaay to expensive now.