Too many Ks. Unless you have a really really huge TV or you sit super close to it, and also have absolutely no vision problems, there’s a pretty good chance you’re not gonna tell the difference between 1080p and 4k.
Comment on James Cameron gives a response to the negative comments on the 4Ks of Aliens and True Lies
UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 5 weeks agoWhy is 4K dumb?
GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 5 weeks ago
xyzzy@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Optimum viewing distance, optimum viewing angle—these are defined things. In my experience, most people are clueless about how to properly set up a TV. So yes, I expect if a TV isn’t set up correctly, the difference between 1080p and 4K wouldn’t be as noticeable. Transfer quality and TV quality also matter.
GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 5 weeks ago
So your saying it doesn’t matter for normal people
xyzzy@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Not sure what the point you’re trying to make is. 4K shouldn’t be an option because you don’t care about it? Most people aren’t the target audience for 4K or even Blu-ray. You’re always free to stick with streaming movies and driving a Camry, normal people do and it works for them.
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
I watch my DVD collection on my 50 inch 4k television, and you know what? they’re okay. It’s a 16:9 television, so I get to choose between letterboxes with widescreen releases or pillarboxes with pan n’ scan releases, but we all do. I’m not worried about 4k content. Honestly I’d be fine with a 1080p panel there.
A computer monitor is a different story; you typically sit a lot closer to it, so pixel density is more significant. I can genuinely tell a difference between my 27" 1080p monitor and my 34" 1440p ultrawide monitor. The latter takes up more of my visual field while retaining about the same PPI. I still don’t think I need 4k here though.
ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
They used AI upscaling. Not only it completely defeats the point of a release like this, it looks like a shimmery mess.