Comment on Universes

• Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’m sorry, fucking what?

  How can lighting, or the sight of something be copyright?

  Fuck what wonderful captialistic hellscape we live in

  source

  • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Architecture is an artistic medium, so it’s subject to copyright. It gets a little complicated though, because this wasn’t legally decided until the latter half of the 20th century.

    source

    • Johanno@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      While architecture could be copyrighted. Public buildings are excluded from that for obvious reasons. This includes the eifel tower.

      source

      • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        TL;DR: The light show is considered a separate artistic creation and the Eiffel Tower’s management company holds the copyright.

        source
    • Gork@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Does the architect hold the copyright of a photograph that a photographer has taken though?

      I can see it getting murky quickly. What if the building is in frame, but is not the focus of the photograph. Can the architect still claim copyright infringement on that particular photo?

      source
• the_crotch@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’ll start obeying French law when they extradite Roman Polanski

  source

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    He’s not in France, so that’s tricky.

    source