Comment on gotdamn
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 4 months agoOnce again, it’s a false equivalence logical fallacy— neither sugar nor fire or water, and there is no reason to believe they would act like water. Especially considering that water is not wet, it just makes things wet.
This seems to be causing you quite a bit of distress and memory problems. I suggest a rest.
BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 4 months ago
what makes water so special that it absolutely under any circumstances never be compared to anything else? the fact that its wet?
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I see you’re still confused. Water isn’t wet; it just makes things wet.
And water isn’t special, either. It can be compared to lots of things— just not falsely, as you have.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 4 months ago
i havent falsely compared water. and i am not confused. it is pretty obvious if youve been around water that it is wet
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 4 months ago
You falsely compared to water to fire and sugar. Water is neither fire nor sugar. Water has none of the properties of fire nor sugar. You are clearly very confused about what water is and what sugar and fire are.
You blamed your “brain” for this. Repeatedly.
May you and your “brain” have a speedy recovery as you ponder how water is not wet, it just makes things wet.