Comment on gotdamn
BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 1 year agoonce again, i must say it was a comparison. i do not know why you take it so literal. water is wet because it makes things wet
Comment on gotdamn
BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 1 year agoonce again, i must say it was a comparison. i do not know why you take it so literal. water is wet because it makes things wet
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Once again, it’s a false equivalence logical fallacy— neither sugar nor fire or water, and there is no reason to believe they would act like water. Especially considering that water is not wet, it just makes things wet.
This seems to be causing you quite a bit of distress and memory problems. I suggest a rest.
BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 1 year ago
what makes water so special that it absolutely under any circumstances never be compared to anything else? the fact that its wet?
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I see you’re still confused. Water isn’t wet; it just makes things wet.
And water isn’t special, either. It can be compared to lots of things— just not falsely, as you have.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 1 year ago
i havent falsely compared water. and i am not confused. it is pretty obvious if youve been around water that it is wet