Comment on gotdamn
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 months agoOne again, I must correct you and - apparently - your brain that makes you forget things.
Water is not wet; it just makes things wet. The transitive property of math does not apply to water because water is not math. (Another thing water is not).
You seem increasingly confused, blaming your “brain” for your mistakes. I suggest giving your “brain” a nice rest.
BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 2 months ago
once again, i must say it was a comparison. i do not know why you take it so literal. water is wet because it makes things wet
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Once again, it’s a false equivalence logical fallacy— neither sugar nor fire or water, and there is no reason to believe they would act like water. Especially considering that water is not wet, it just makes things wet.
This seems to be causing you quite a bit of distress and memory problems. I suggest a rest.
BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 2 months ago
what makes water so special that it absolutely under any circumstances never be compared to anything else? the fact that its wet?
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I see you’re still confused. Water isn’t wet; it just makes things wet.
And water isn’t special, either. It can be compared to lots of things— just not falsely, as you have.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯