Comment on gotdamn
BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 2 months agowater is wet. because it makes things wet. and you seem to not grasp what a comparison is either. i never said fire or sugar was water i was comparing your logic to something else
and my first point is basically what is being said about water “not being wet” it is yet another comparison, as in i didnt forget my brain made me forget. water isnt wet it just makes things wet. comparison
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 months ago
One again, I must correct you and - apparently - your brain that makes you forget things.
Water is not wet; it just makes things wet. The transitive property of math does not apply to water because water is not math. (Another thing water is not).
You seem increasingly confused, blaming your “brain” for your mistakes. I suggest giving your “brain” a nice rest.
BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 2 months ago
once again, i must say it was a comparison. i do not know why you take it so literal. water is wet because it makes things wet
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Once again, it’s a false equivalence logical fallacy— neither sugar nor fire or water, and there is no reason to believe they would act like water. Especially considering that water is not wet, it just makes things wet.
This seems to be causing you quite a bit of distress and memory problems. I suggest a rest.
BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 2 months ago
what makes water so special that it absolutely under any circumstances never be compared to anything else? the fact that its wet?